Share:

RTE I695 over RTE I295

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82130, -73.81476
40°49'17" N, 73°48'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I695 over RTE I295
Structure number:000000001066170
Location:1.2 MILE I78 & I95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Total length:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:57°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:98,400 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$439,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201489.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood98400
August 201289.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good98400
September 201089.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good98400
September 200889.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good98400
October 200689.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good98400
November 200489.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent98400
November 200289.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent98400
December 200089.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent98400
June 199919.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor98400
May 199819.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor98400
May 19972.6Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious98400
May 19962.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious98400
May 19952.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious98400
July 199415.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor90290
August 199315.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor100900
September 199215.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor97500
October 199115.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor97500