Share:

GRAND CONCOURSE over RTE I95, RTE I95, NYCTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84505, -73.91113
40°50'42" N, 73°54'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GRAND CONCOURSE over RTE I95, RTE I95, NYCTA
Structure number:000000001066289
Location:.8 MI E I87+I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Total length:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:142.1 ft. [43.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:314.0 ft. [95.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:57°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,216 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:90.5 tons [82.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$59,700,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201481.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
August 201281.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
October 201081.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
September 200881.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
October 200681.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
October 200481.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair22216
September 200280.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair22216
June 200080.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair19732
May 199893.0Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory19732
March 199657.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor43401
April 199464.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor23750
May 199264.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor23750
October 199061.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor23750