CLAY AVENUE over RTE I95, 95I 95IX1M21012


+40.84486, -73.90485
40°50'42" N, 73°54'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CLAY AVENUE over RTE I95, 95I 95IX1M21012
Structure number:000000001066320
Location:1.2 MI E I87+I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Total length:142.7 ft. [43.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:82.4 ft. [25.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,615 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:83.6
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,862,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201483.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3615
November 201283.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3615
December 201083.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3615
December 200883.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3615
November 200683.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3615
November 200484.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3615
October 200284.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3615
August 200084.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3615
May 199891.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3615
July 199679.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2800
June 199479.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2800
August 199267.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair2800
March 199068.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair2800