Share:

CROTONA PARKWAY over RTE I95, RTE I95

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84018, -73.88575
40°50'25" N, 73°53'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CROTONA PARKWAY over RTE I95, RTE I95
Structure number:000000001066399
Location:2.1 MI E I87 + I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Total length:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:120.1 ft. [36.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:203.4 ft. [62.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:28°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,522 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:73.8 tons [67.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:66.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$30,507,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201466.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
March 201266.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
May 201066.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
April 200866.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
April 200666.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
March 200466.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory1522
April 200266.9Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory980
March 200081.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory980
June 199879.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory980
March 199664.6Structurally deficient-PoorFair931
April 199462.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair20100
June 199262.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair20100
March 199062.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair20100