Share:

RTE I278 over ZEREGA AVENUE, BRUCKNER

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82797, -73.84426
40°49'41" N, 73°50'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over ZEREGA AVENUE, BRUCKNER
Structure number:00000000106650B
Location:JCT I95 & I278 & I295
Purpose:Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:122.7 ft. [37.4 m]
Total length:807.8 ft. [246.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:49.2 ft. [15.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Year reconstructed:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:8
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,551 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:67.9 tons [61.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.9 tons [36.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$677,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201494.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood6551
July 201294.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood6551
August 201094.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood6551
August 200894.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood6551
September 200694.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood6551
October 200494.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood6551
October 200277.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood104000
August 200077.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood104000
July 199877.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood104000
February 199638.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair104000
February 199435.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair104000
April 199233.3Structurally deficientPoorFairFair104000
July 199033.3Structurally deficientPoorFairFair104000