Share:

RTE I95 over BE NB SERVICE RD

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82802, -73.83830
40°49'41" N, 73°50'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I95 over BE NB SERVICE RD
Structure number:00000000106650D
Location:JCT I95 & I278 & I295
Purpose:Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Total length:432.8 ft. [131.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.4 ft. [12.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:99.9 tons [90.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$428,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201594.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood-
July 201394.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70000
June 201194.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood70000
June 200994.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood70000
July 200794.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood70000
August 200594.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood70000
July 200394.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood70000
September 200175.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood70000
June 199975.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good70000
May 199754.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood70000
April 199544.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair70000
May 199348.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair70000
September 199148.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair70000