RTE I278 over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE


+40.82910, -73.84003
40°49'45" N, 73°50'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:00000000106652A
Location:JCT I95 & I878 & I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:143.7 ft. [43.8 m]
Total length:1890.8 ft. [576.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:86,813 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.4 tons [86.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,653,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201590.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood86813
July 201389.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16839
June 201189.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16839
June 200989.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood16839
June 200789.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood16839
June 200589.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood16839
May 200388.9Not deficientExcellentGoodGood16839
July 200173.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood84131
March 200172.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory84131
May 199872.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory84131
December 199762.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair84131
October 199626.6Structurally deficientFairSeriousPoor84131
September 199445.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor84131
September 199245.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor84131
October 199043.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor84131