RTE I95 over RTE 908A, 908X908AX1M120


+40.82825, -73.84115
40°49'42" N, 73°50'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I95 over RTE 908A, 908X908AX1M120
Structure number:00000000106653A
Location:JCT I95 & I878 & I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:174.9 ft. [53.3 m]
Total length:1501.1 ft. [457.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.8 ft. [10.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.5 ft. [15.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:70,000 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$20,954,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201491.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood70000
July 201291.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70000
August 201091.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood70000
July 200891.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood70000
July 200691.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70000
September 200491.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood70000
September 200289.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood70000
August 200079.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory70000
May 199875.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory70000
October 199660.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor70000
August 199455.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor70000
August 199255.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor70000
August 199055.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor70000