RTE I95 over RTE I695, RTE I695


+40.83611, -73.82452
40°50'10" N, 73°49'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I95 over RTE I695, RTE I695
Structure number:000000001066569
Location:JCT I295 & I95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:206.0 ft. [62.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:68.2 ft. [20.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:49°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:93,833 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:99.2 tons [90.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,926,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201696.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good93833
February 201496.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good59303
February 201296.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good59300
March 201096.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good143147
March 200896.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent59281
March 200683.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory59303
March 200483.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory143147
February 200279.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory143147
February 200079.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory143147
April 199868.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair132709
February 199668.9Not deficientFairFairFair144645
March 199462.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor139843
April 199262.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor157459
April 199062.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor157459