Share:

RTE I95 over RTE I87, HARLEM RIVER, 8

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84542, -73.92801
40°50'44" N, 73°55'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I95 over RTE I87, HARLEM RIVER, 8
Structure number:000000001066889
Location:JCT I 87 + I 95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:546.0 ft. [166.4 m]
Total length:1529.9 ft. [466.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:127.6 ft. [38.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:102.7 ft. [31.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:2013
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:127,151 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:In place and functioning [2]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:99.4 tons [90.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$9,065,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201580.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory127151
November 201383.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory127151
December 201256.6Structurally deficientFairPoorFair127200
November 201156.6Structurally deficientFairPoorFair127200
December 201058.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair101296
December 200953.9Structurally deficientFairPoorFair101296
December 200855.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair81889
December 200755.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair81889
December 200652.7Structurally deficientFairPoorFair117083
December 200555.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair81889
November 200455.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair81889
September 200355.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair81889
November 200269.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair147625
November 200169.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair147625
September 200067.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair170949
August 199949.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair142496
December 199849.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair177802
December 199732.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor175279
September 199636.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor175279
July 199535.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor180507
December 199435.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor151900
November 199335.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor152460
November 199235.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor192800
October 199136.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor177959