Share:

WEST FORDHAM ROAD over RTE I87, RTE I87

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86188, -73.91278
40°51'43" N, 73°54'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WEST FORDHAM ROAD over RTE I87, RTE I87
Structure number:000000001066940
Location:1.4 MILE N JCT I87 & I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:59.7 ft. [18.2 m]
Total length:123.7 ft. [37.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:101.7 ft. [31.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:34°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,260 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:85.8 tons [78.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$10,010,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201589.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood37260
June 201388.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood43846
May 201188.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood43846
June 200989.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood31915
June 200789.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood26280
April 200588.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodSatisfactory43846
April 200388.8Not deficientExcellentVery GoodSatisfactory43846
June 200188.9Not deficientExcellentVery GoodSatisfactory41649
July 199988.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentSatisfactory41649
May 199789.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory25300
May 199542.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor25300
June 199342.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor25300
September 199142.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor25300