Share:

WESTCHESTER AVE over RTE 907H, RTE 907H, NYC

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82987, -73.87318
40°49'48" N, 73°52'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WESTCHESTER AVE over RTE 907H, RTE 907H, NYC
Structure number:000000001067077
Location:.5 MI S I95 & BX RIVER PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Total length:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:10.5 ft. [3.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,478 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,674,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201478.4Functionally obsolete-FairGood9478
February 201278.4Functionally obsolete-FairGood9478
March 201078.4Functionally obsolete-FairGood9478
February 200859.9Functionally obsolete-FairGood25527
March 200661.2Functionally obsolete-FairGood9478
February 200462.2Functionally obsolete-FairGood9478
April 200261.2Functionally obsolete-FairGood9328
March 200059.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9328
April 199859.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9328
March 199645.9Structurally deficient-PoorPoor8592
March 199446.7Structurally deficient-PoorPoor6800
May 199244.4Structurally deficient-PoorPoor6800
March 199060.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair6800