+40.87818, -73.86987
40°52'41" N, 73°52'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:GUN HILL ROAD over RTE 907H, RTE 907H
Structure number:000000001067130
Location:3.0 MI N I95+BX RIVER PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Total length:97.8 ft. [29.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:95.5 ft. [29.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,448 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.8 tons [58.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.5 tons [22.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$22,986,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201680.4Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood20448
February 201470.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood20448
February 201270.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood20400
February 201068.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood43462
February 200868.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood43462
January 200668.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood43462
February 200468.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory43462
January 200268.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory35955
January 200043.3Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor35955
April 199868.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory35955
February 199639.3Structurally deficient-FairPoor38706
March 199447.0Structurally deficient-FairPoor13500
February 199249.1Structurally deficient-PoorPoor13500
February 199061.4Structurally deficient-FairPoor13500