Share:

BLOOMINGDALE ROAD over RTE 909C, RTE 909C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.52840, -74.21673
40°31'42" N, 74°13'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BLOOMINGDALE ROAD over RTE 909C, RTE 909C
Structure number:000000001067500
Location:.7 MI E JCT440+W SHORE EX
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,010 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:84.8 tons [77.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:50.9 tons [46.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$737,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201474.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood10010
January 201293.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood10010
January 201093.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood10010
January 200893.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood11589
January 200693.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood10010
January 200494.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood10010
February 200294.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10010
January 200094.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10010
February 199894.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7745
April 199662.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair7900
April 199463.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair7900
March 199263.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair7900
February 199063.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair7900