Share:

HUGUENOT AVENUE over RTE 909C, RTE 909C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.53488, -74.19329
40°32'06" N, 74°11'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HUGUENOT AVENUE over RTE 909C, RTE 909C
Structure number:000000001067530
Location:2 MI E JCT SH440 & WS EXP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:182.8 ft. [55.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,700 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.8 tons [97.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.2
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$6,988,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201482.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair13700
January 201262.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair13700
January 201062.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair13700
January 200874.3Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodVery Good11429
January 200674.1Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodVery Good13700
February 200475.1Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodVery Good13700
February 200276.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good13700
April 200075.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13700
June 199895.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12289
May 199644.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor21366
June 199452.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor3900
May 199252.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor3900
March 199052.2Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor3900