Share:

ANNADALE ROAD over RTE 909C, 909C 909CX6M12

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.55525, -74.17601
40°33'19" N, 74°10'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ANNADALE ROAD over RTE 909C, 909C 909CX6M12
Structure number:000000001067570
Location:3.7MI E JCT440+W SHORE EX
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:115.8 ft. [35.3 m]
Total length:238.9 ft. [72.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:61°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,571 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$934,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201578.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood4571
June 201376.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6048
May 201176.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6048
May 200977.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood4902
May 200776.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6638
May 200576.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6048
May 200376.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6048
May 200176.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6048
September 199976.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6223
August 199765.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair6223
June 199550.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor2100
November 199350.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor2100
November 199150.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor2100