+40.63096, -74.14592
40°37'51" N, 74°08'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:WALKER STREET over RTE 440, RTE 440
Structure number:000000001067640
Location:JCT 440+WALKER ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:144.7 ft. [44.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.2 ft. [14.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,219 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.8 tons [87.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:50.9 tons [46.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$251,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201493.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good9219
February 201275.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9219
March 201075.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good9219
May 200875.3Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good10322
March 200675.4Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good9219
April 200473.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good9219
April 200273.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good9219
February 200073.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory9219
April 199872.3Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory10599
July 199644.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6150
July 199445.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6150
June 199245.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6150
May 199045.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor6150