Share:

RTE I278 over RICHMOND AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.61517, -74.15731
40°36'55" N, 74°09'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over RICHMOND AVE
Structure number:000000001067691
Location:JCT I278+RICHMOND AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:114.8 ft. [35.0 m]
Total length:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:62,696 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,772,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201474.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood62696
June 201274.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood64550
June 201072.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood95063
July 200874.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood56215
April 200674.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood56759
April 200469.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood121942
April 200273.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood52809
February 200073.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good65048
March 199872.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory67635
June 199657.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair58772
May 199441.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor48816
March 199238.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor64155
February 199061.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair44790