Share:

HYLAN BLVD NB over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.60600, -74.07658
40°36'22" N, 74°04'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HYLAN BLVD NB over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001067840
Location:2.3MI W JCT I278+BELT PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:107.0 ft. [32.6 m]
Total length:217.9 ft. [66.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.5 ft. [15.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,884 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:77.4
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$9,847,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201477.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory9884
August 201260.2Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory9884
September 201071.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory10036
October 200971.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory10036
October 200871.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory10036
June 200671.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory9884
May 200472.4Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory9884
June 200272.4Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory9884
July 200063.2Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodFair9884
September 199861.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair10401
October 199647.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6200
October 199461.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair6200
October 199247.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6200
September 199047.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor6200