Share:

FINGERBOARD RD over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.60393, -74.06919
40°36'14" N, 74°04'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FINGERBOARD RD over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001067850
Location:1.8MI W JCT I278+BELT PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:103.0 ft. [31.4 m]
Total length:210.0 ft. [64.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:52.2 ft. [15.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:73.8 ft. [22.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2012
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,171 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,724,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201476.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent7171
May 201276.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent7171
May 201073.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7171
June 200873.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7688
June 200673.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7171
May 200473.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7171
June 200273.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7171
October 200073.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7171
September 199872.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory7682
November 199658.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair7983
October 199459.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory4700
October 199246.1Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor4700
September 199048.1Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor4700