Share:

RTE 440 over ARTHUR KILL ROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.55734, -74.20520
40°33'26" N, 74°12'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 440 over ARTHUR KILL ROAD
Structure number:000000001069711
Location:1.5 MI S FRESH KILLS &WSE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Total length:139.8 ft. [42.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:47°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1977
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:47,307 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:67.9 tons [61.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$265,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201592.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood47307
August 201492.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood47307
October 201392.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood46400
July 201292.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood46400
August 201193.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood40403
September 201092.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood46395
October 200992.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood46775
November 200892.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood46775
August 200693.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood40526
August 200493.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory40403
September 200292.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory43422
February 200062.9Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor41511
April 199864.1Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor25630
August 199763.8Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor29849
June 199661.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor29849
April 199565.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor29849
July 199464.1Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor43481
May 199367.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor29849
May 199285.2Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair9705
May 199081.6Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair14867