Share:

RTE I878 over SO CONDUIT AVENUE, RTE 9

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66511, -73.79291
40°39'54" N, 73°47'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I878 over SO CONDUIT AVENUE, RTE 9
Structure number:000000001073020
Location:.5 MI E JCT I687 & S.H.27
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Total length:399.0 ft. [121.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,500 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.2 tons [91.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$289,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201593.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16500
June 201393.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16500
June 201193.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16500
June 200993.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16500
June 200793.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood16500
April 200593.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood16500
April 200393.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood16500
May 200193.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood16500
February 199995.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good16500
20000.0Not applicable---16000
May 199797.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16500
June 199594.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16500
May 199394.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16500
March 199193.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16500