RTE 440 over RTE 440, RAMP TO NB KWVP


+40.52555, -74.22365
40°31'32" N, 74°13'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 440 over RTE 440, RAMP TO NB KWVP
Structure number:000000001075071
Location:JCT 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Total length:115.8 ft. [35.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,003 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:66.9 tons [60.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$36,914,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201491.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory2003
April 201291.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory2003
May 201088.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood73606
June 200888.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood72836
March 200688.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood70250
March 200492.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood2003
April 200290.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory67600
January 200070.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory67600
February 199870.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory67600
March 199651.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair67600
March 199434.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor67600
May 199255.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair67600
June 199054.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair67600