Share:

RTE 440 over RTE 440, RAMP TO NB KWV

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.52637, -74.22331
40°31'35" N, 74°13'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 440 over RTE 440, RAMP TO NB KWV
Structure number:000000001075072
Location:JCT 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:121.7 ft. [37.1 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.3 ft. [13.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30,283 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$36,333,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201492.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30283
April 201292.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30283
May 201090.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood73606
June 200890.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood72836
March 200690.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood70250
March 200493.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood30283
April 200293.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory30283
January 200093.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory30283
February 199893.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory30283
March 199680.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30283
March 199481.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30283
May 199292.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30283
June 199079.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair30283