Share:

RTE 440 over RTE 909C, RTE 909C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.52652, -74.22358
40°31'35" N, 74°13'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 440 over RTE 909C, RTE 909C
Structure number:000000001075091
Location:JCT 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Total length:203.8 ft. [62.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.6 ft. [14.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,694 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:66.9 tons [60.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:85.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$723,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201485.9Not deficientGoodExcellentFair37694
April 201285.9Not deficientGoodExcellentFair37694
May 201084.0Not deficientGoodExcellentFair73606
June 200884.0Not deficientGoodExcellentFair72836
September 200684.2Not deficientGoodExcellentFair70250
October 200483.9Not deficientSatisfactoryExcellentFair37694
May 200295.1Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory39495
January 200077.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory41141
March 199865.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair41483
July 199645.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor36400
July 199445.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor43481
May 199246.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor36099
June 199063.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair35000