Share:

RTE 440 over RTE 909C, RTE 909C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.52631, -74.22359
40°31'35" N, 74°13'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 440 over RTE 909C, RTE 909C
Structure number:000000001075092
Location:JCT 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Total length:203.8 ft. [62.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.6 ft. [14.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,694 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:107.8 tons [98.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$193,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201494.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood37694
April 201292.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood37694
May 201092.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood36803
June 200892.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood36418
September 200692.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood35125
October 200492.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood37694
May 200292.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood39495
January 200091.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood41141
March 199891.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory41483
July 199677.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair36400
July 199477.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair43481
May 199278.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair36099
June 199078.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair35000