Share:

RTE 909C over RTE 440

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.52693, -74.22118
40°31'37" N, 74°13'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 909C over RTE 440
Structure number:000000001075102
Location:JCT 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:94.8 ft. [28.9 m]
Total length:98.8 ft. [30.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,859 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:90.9 tons [82.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,477,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201495.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10859
April 201295.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10850
May 201095.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11911
June 200895.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11366
March 200695.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood18177
April 200495.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood18177
April 200295.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17760
January 200095.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16640
March 199891.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory13801
June 199676.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair35000
June 199477.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair35000
May 199277.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair35000
June 199077.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair35000