Share:

BLOOMINGDALE RD over RTE 440, RTE 440

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.54857, -74.22066
40°32'55" N, 74°13'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BLOOMINGDALE RD over RTE 440, RTE 440
Structure number:000000001075130
Location:1.8MI N 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:134.8 ft. [41.1 m]
Total length:253.9 ft. [77.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:44°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,854 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:104.8 tons [95.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,170,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201495.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9854
June 201294.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9854
June 201194.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9854
July 201094.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9854
August 200994.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11589
September 200894.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11531
May 200694.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9854
June 200495.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9854
May 200295.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood9854
March 200095.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8703
March 199884.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair8703
May 199668.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1500
June 199468.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1500
May 199268.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1500
May 199067.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1500