Share:

RTE 440 over ROSSVILLE AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.55484, -74.21316
40°33'17" N, 74°12'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 440 over ROSSVILLE AVE
Structure number:000000001075141
Location:2.3MI N 440+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:75.8 ft. [23.1 m]
Total length:79.7 ft. [24.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.6 ft. [14.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,533 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:77.9 tons [70.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$203,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201488.0Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentGood37533
June 201288.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood36800
June 201088.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood36803
July 200888.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood36418
April 200688.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood35125
May 200488.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood27129
May 200288.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30146
February 200086.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30146
February 199886.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood32529
March 199686.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29849
March 199485.4Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory43481
April 199288.2Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9705
February 199088.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14867