Share:

RTE 908B over RTE 907M

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.71621, -73.82547
40°42'58" N, 73°49'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 908B over RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001075239
Location:JCT GCP & I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Total length:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1950
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:90,310 [as of 2004]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:58.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$15,276,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201458.9Structurally deficientFairPoorGood90310
April 201260.1Structurally deficient-PoorGood90310
April 201060.1Structurally deficient-PoorGood90310
April 200877.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood79214
March 200657.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory93641
April 200457.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory90310
June 200242.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood69111
March 200042.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood69111
June 199860.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory76069
June 199635.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory69800
May 199437.3Not deficient-PoorSatisfactory69800
February 199242.7Not deficient-PoorSatisfactory40000
March 199042.7Not deficient-PoorSatisfactory40000