Share:

LAFAYETTE AVENUE over RTE I678, RTE I678

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82496, -73.83618
40°49'30" N, 73°50'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LAFAYETTE AVENUE over RTE I678, RTE I678
Structure number:000000001075360
Location:.3 MI S JCT I95 & I878
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:143.7 ft. [43.8 m]
Total length:148.0 ft. [45.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,983 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:77.9 tons [70.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$91,503,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201490.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6983
August 201290.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7000
October 201090.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15719
September 200890.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16477
September 200690.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15719
October 200491.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15719
November 200295.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood6852
September 200068.5Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorGood6852
November 199968.5Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorGood6852
July 199868.5Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory6852
July 199767.5Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory6852
February 199683.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair6852
January 199483.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair4900
March 199283.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair4900
March 199067.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4900