Share:

COHANCY STREET over RTE I878

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66594, -73.83502
40°39'57" N, 73°50'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COHANCY STREET over RTE I878
Structure number:000000001075600
Location:1.8 MI W JCT I678 & I78
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:72.8 ft. [22.2 m]
Total length:74.8 ft. [22.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,571 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$203,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201475.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9571
April 201275.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9571
April 201075.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9571
April 200875.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9883
May 200692.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9571
April 200592.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9571
March 200481.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood9571
April 200392.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9571
April 200281.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood17349
February 200083.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood17349
April 199883.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory17349
April 199677.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair4310
March 199479.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair4310
April 199279.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair4310
August 199079.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair4310