RTE I878 over RTE I678, RTE I678


+40.66526, -73.80218
40°39'55" N, 73°48'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I878 over RTE I678, RTE I678
Structure number:000000001075630
Location:JCT I678 + I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Total length:200.8 ft. [61.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:49,237 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,444,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201592.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood49237
May 201392.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood49237
May 201190.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood45700
April 201087.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21600
March 200887.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21600
January 200687.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21600
March 200488.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21600
April 200289.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21600
February 200091.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21600
March 199891.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21600
April 199677.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair21600
March 199461.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor21600
June 199263.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor21600
September 199065.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor21600