RTE 907M over RTE 907M, WB GCP - NORTH


+40.75746, -73.85216
40°45'27" N, 73°51'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907M over RTE 907M, WB GCP - NORTH
Structure number:000000001075670
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:250.0 ft. [76.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,584 [as of 2003]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.0 tons [34.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,598,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201479.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11584
March 201279.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11584
August 201179.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11584
March 201079.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11584
May 200979.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood11584
February 200879.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11584
February 200679.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory11584
January 200479.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory11584
January 200267.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory198019
January 200065.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory198019
January 199854.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair198019
February 199638.0Structurally deficientVery GoodFairPoor198019
January 199438.0Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor198019
January 199265.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory198019
January 199034.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor198019