RTE I678 over RTE I678


+40.66331, -73.80227
40°39'48" N, 73°48'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I678 over RTE I678
Structure number:000000001075710
Location:.2 MI S RTE 678+RTE 27
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:97.8 ft. [29.8 m]
Total length:185.7 ft. [56.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:39°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:53,292 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:90.9 tons [82.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:58.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,444,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201458.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodFair53292
February 201258.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair53300
February 201061.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair21665
February 200845.5Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodPoor21665
January 200672.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory21665
February 200472.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory21665
March 200272.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory21665
February 200074.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory26195
March 199863.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair26195
April 199658.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair31000
March 199443.2Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor31000
April 199243.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor31000
August 199044.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor31000