Share:

NORTH NARROWS RD over RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.60440, -74.06899
40°36'16" N, 74°04'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NORTH NARROWS RD over RTE I278
Structure number:000000001075760
Location:1.9MI W JCT I278+BELT PKY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:74.8 ft. [22.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,932 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$344,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201472.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory12932
April 201274.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory12932
April 201076.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood12932
June 200876.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood12932
April 200676.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood12932
April 200474.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood12932
May 200274.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12932
March 200074.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8697
April 199874.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory8697
July 199663.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4800
July 199468.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor4800
May 199268.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor4800
August 199068.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor4800