RTE I678 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE


+40.75736, -73.85239
40°45'27" N, 73°51'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I678 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001075930
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Total length:726.7 ft. [221.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:92,583 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:57.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$10,319,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201457.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairFair92583
November 201257.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairFair92583
December 201038.4Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor92583
December 200957.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair92583
December 200857.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair92583
October 200669.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory92583
October 200468.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory92583
October 200269.8Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory92583
October 200071.8Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory92583
November 199873.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood71469
December 199633.6Not deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor68857
December 199440.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor68857
October 199237.0Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorPoor111874
October 199034.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor111874