Share:

RTE I678 over RTE 25A, RTE 907M, RTE 9

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75930, -73.85592
40°45'33" N, 73°51'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I678 over RTE 25A, RTE 907M, RTE 9
Structure number:000000001075940
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:121.7 ft. [37.1 m]
Total length:1277.0 ft. [389.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:18
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:29,391 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$47,985,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201474.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory29391
June 201274.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory29400
June 201064.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory144623
July 200864.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood144623
June 200664.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood142949
June 200462.6Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood141358
September 200265.9Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood92583
June 200165.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood92583
May 200067.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory92583
20000.0Not applicable---55000
August 199869.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory69967
October 199637.2Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor68857
October 199440.1Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorPoor68857
October 199217.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorSerious111874
November 199034.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor111874