25AXW FROM 907MXW over RTE 907M


+40.75938, -73.85383
40°45'34" N, 73°51'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:25AXW FROM 907MXW over RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001075960
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:116.8 ft. [35.6 m]
Total length:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,227 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.8 tons [91.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$84,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201594.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
May 201394.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
June 201194.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
May 200994.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
May 200794.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
May 200594.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
April 200394.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
May 200194.4Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory12227
January 199994.4Not deficientExcellentVery GoodSatisfactory12227
April 199794.4Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good12227
May 199548.5Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor8464
March 199547.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor8464
May 199247.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor8464
September 199060.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor8464