RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH


+40.75750, -73.85244
40°45'27" N, 73°51'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH
Structure number:000000001075990
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:295.9 ft. [90.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:72,763 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.9 tons [25.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,398,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201455.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentFairSatisfactory72763
October 201255.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentFairGood72800
October 201069.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood54700
August 200869.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood54700
July 200669.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood54700
March 200469.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood54700
April 200269.2Not deficientExcellentGoodGood54700
February 200069.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory54700
March 199869.2Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory54700
June 199658.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory54700
April 199443.8Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorPoor54700
March 199417.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious54700
April 199217.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious54700
August 199117.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious54700