RTE 908B over RTE I678, RTE I678, RTE


+40.71580, -73.82627
40°42'57" N, 73°49'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 908B over RTE I678, RTE I678, RTE
Structure number:000000001076039
Location:JCT GCP+ROUTE 678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Total length:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:19°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:76,316 [as of 2002]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.9 tons [26.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:53.4
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$6,750,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201453.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair76316
October 201263.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory76316
November 201063.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory76316
December 200865.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory76316
November 200665.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory76316
September 200465.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory76316
September 200266.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory69111
June 200066.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory69111
August 199851.1Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair76069
October 199755.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair69800
September 199630.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor69800
July 199526.9Not deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor69800
August 199426.9Not deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor69800
July 199326.9Not deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor69800
February 199232.4Not deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor40000
April 199054.2Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair40000