Share:

BE NB SERVICE RD over RTE I95, 908A NB TO 95I

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82821, -73.83678
40°49'42" N, 73°50'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BE NB SERVICE RD over RTE I95, 908A NB TO 95I
Structure number:000000001076110
Location:JCT I95+I878+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Total length:146.0 ft. [44.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:49°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,874 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$210,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201575.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17874
August 201376.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9958
September 201176.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9958
September 200976.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood9958
September 200776.4Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood9958
September 200576.4Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood9958
August 200375.4Not deficientGoodExcellentExcellent9958
October 200175.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood16241
October 199974.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory16241
February 199863.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair16241
January 199640.7Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor16241
January 199460.5Structurally deficientPoorFairFair3600
February 199260.5Structurally deficientPoorFairFair3600
April 199071.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory3600