Share:

BE SERVICE RD SB over RTE I278, ZEREGA AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82844, -73.84394
40°49'42" N, 73°50'38" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BE SERVICE RD SB over RTE I278, ZEREGA AVE
Structure number:000000001076130
Location:JCT I95+I878+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Total length:227.7 ft. [69.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:58.7 ft. [17.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,010,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201580.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood-
August 201369.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood6302
August 201174.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6302
August 200974.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood6302
September 200774.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood6302
October 200574.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood6302
September 200374.6Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood6302
September 200163.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood169066
September 199963.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory169066
January 199849.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair169066
January 199644.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor169066
January 199444.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor169066
February 199242.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor169066
April 199056.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair169066