RTE I495 over RTE I278, RTE I495


+40.73447, -73.92272
40°44'04" N, 73°55'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE I278, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001076239
Location:JCT I278+I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:77.8 ft. [23.7 m]
Total length:79.7 ft. [24.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:208.0 ft. [63.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:69,317 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:84.8 tons [77.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$991,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201589.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood69317
May 201385.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood69317
June 201185.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood186779
June 200989.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood162990
June 200789.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood158270
June 200585.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good186779
July 200385.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good186779
March 200381.0Not deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory178299
January 200080.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory178299
20000.0Not applicable---33000
March 199871.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair158642
March 199653.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor115687
March 199453.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor74035
April 199253.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor157430
May 199053.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor122266