RTE 907M over RTE I295, RTE I295, 295I

Map

Coordinates:
+40.72624, -73.75708
40°43'34" N, 73°45'25" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Name:	RTE 907M over RTE I295, RTE I295, 295I
Structure number:	000000001076322
Location:	JCT GCP+I78
Purpose:	Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) `[19]`
Length of largest span:	81.7 ft. `[24.9 m]`
Total length:	287.7 ft. `[87.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	26.6 ft. `[8.1 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	14.4 ft. `[4.4 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.1 ft. `[4.3 m]`
Skew angle:	99°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1963
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,327 `[as of 2000]`
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Operating rating:	98.8 tons `[89.8 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	71.8 tons `[65.3 metric tons]`
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete `[2]`
Sufficiency rating:	80.0
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$4,437,000

Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,500 `[as of 1991]`
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Operating rating:	73.3 tons `[66.6 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons `[32.4 metric tons]`
Evaluation:	Structurally deficient `[1]`
Sufficiency rating:	47.0
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$432,000