Share:

RTE 907M over MOTOR PARKWAY

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.73904, -73.74016
40°44'21" N, 73°44'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907M over MOTOR PARKWAY
Structure number:000000001076530
Location:.6 MI SW GCP+CRS ISL PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway over pedestrian/bicycle trail
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:96.8 ft. [29.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,280 [as of 2009]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.8 tons [97.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,801,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201494.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1280
January 201294.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood1280
January 201094.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1280
January 200894.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1280
January 200694.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1280
January 200489.7Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1280
March 200290.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood1280
February 200089.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood1280
March 199890.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1280
March 199685.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1280
March 199491.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1280
May 199291.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1280
September 199091.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1280