RTE 907M over RTE 907A


+40.74313, -73.73493
40°44'35" N, 73°44'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907M over RTE 907A
Structure number:000000001076560
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:101.7 ft. [31.0 m]
Total length:107.0 ft. [32.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,581 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:105.8 tons [96.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,589,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201495.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16581
April 201295.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16581
April 201095.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16581
April 200895.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16581
May 200695.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16581
January 200495.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory16581
February 200286.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory185286
February 200086.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory185286
March 199886.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory185286
April 199671.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair185286
March 199469.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair185286
May 199253.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor185286
September 199053.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor185286