Share:

CBE SERVICE RD EB over RTE 907H, RTE 907H

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.83597, -73.87380
40°50'09" N, 73°52'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CBE SERVICE RD EB over RTE 907H, RTE 907H
Structure number:000000001076680
Location:JCT I95+BRONX RIVER PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,994 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.0 tons [82.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$12,556,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201559.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood7994
September 201361.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood7994
October 201161.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood7800
October 200961.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood10807
June 200759.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood32653
July 200571.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood32653
July 200371.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood32653
August 200170.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood48175
September 199970.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood48175
January 199859.2Functionally obsolete-FairGood48175
January 199639.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory48175
January 199444.6Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory29700
February 199242.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory29700
March 199060.3Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory29700