RTE I495 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE


+40.74016, -73.84567
40°44'25" N, 73°50'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001076700
Location:JCT G C PKWY & I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:93.8 ft. [28.6 m]
Total length:302.8 ft. [92.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:22°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50,657 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:69.2
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$12,041,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201469.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
July 201269.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
July 201067.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
May 200967.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
June 200867.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
April 200665.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
May 200467.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50657
June 200264.6Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood48833
April 200070.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory48833
July 199870.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory48833
July 199634.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor48833
June 199457.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair40000
August 199257.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair40000
October 199039.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor40000