Share:

ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75275, -73.85191
40°45'10" N, 73°51'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC
Structure number:000000001076767
Location:.4 MI S GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Total length:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,085 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.5
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$2,721,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201472.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13085
April 201272.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13100
May 201070.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood24192
May 200872.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13233
May 200670.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood24192
January 200470.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood24192
January 200246.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood22514
January 200054.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22514
January 199854.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory22514
February 199617.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor22514
January 199417.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor20000
February 199217.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor20000
May 199014.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor20000